top of page

Substance

Key Figures: John Locke, Baruch Spinoza, George Berkeley, Rene Descartes, Immanuel Kant, Aristotle, etc.

‘Substance’ is a term within metaphysics that is really hard to define - and that is precisely what the debate surrounding it attempts to do. Taking a standard view, substance is ‘something’ which underlies a thing’s properties. For example, we may recognize that a blue wooden block and a red wooden block are of the same substance because they both share the same underlying material. The concept of substance is also useful in this way to distinguish between what a thing substantially is (i.e. what its true essence is), and what its accidental properties are. If we deny that a blue wooden block has that underlying material substrata, then we get no closer to knowing what the thing’s necessary essence is. We are then left with a bundle of properties that form a ‘blue wooden block’, and we are only able to loosely and abstractly identify that block with another one by inferring their similarity- since they don’t really share anything substantially the same. Thus, the long-lasting debate within metaphysics is what exactly substance as a whole is - for example, is all substance formed out of physical material? How exactly does a thing’s accidental or contingent (or non-essential) properties relate to its necessary or essential substance? There are many epistemological concerns as well - since, as many philosophers have pointed out, we only seem to interact with the non-essential properties in the world, so, are we even able to know what anything really is? The term substance is also used more generally to describe particular things.

bottom of page